منابع
الف- فارسی
- جوزف، م. (1386). پیش‌بینی و ارزیابی فناوری (ترجمۀ مجتبی تیموری). رشد علوم اجتماعی، دورۀ 11، شمارۀ 1، صص 52 ـ 54.
- ملک‌زاده، غ. (1384). ارزیابی فناوری؛ ضرورت‌ها و الزامات. رشد فناوری، شمارۀ 1، سال 2، صص 30 ـ 34.
- نوروززاده، ر.؛ شفیع‌زاده، ح. و روحانی، ش. (1392). ارزیابی و تحلیل بخش علم و فناوری قانون برنامه پنجم توسعه از منظر اسناد فرادستی. فصلنامۀ راهبرد، سال 22، شمارۀ 66، صص 285 ـ 314.
ب- انگلیسی
- Ahn, S. J., Yoon, H. Y., & Lee, Y. J. (2021). Text mining as a tool for real-time technology assessment: Application to the cross-national comparative study on artificial organ technology. Technology in Society, 66.
- Assefa, G., & Frostell, B. (2007). Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologies. Technology in Society, 29, 63–78.
- Chen, K., Jarboe, K., & Wolfe, J. (1981). Long-range scenario construction for technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 20, 27–40.
- Coates, J. F. (1974). Some methods and techniques for comprehensive impact assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 6, 341–357.
- Coates, J. F. (2001). A 21st century agenda for terchnology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 67, 303–308.
- Coates, J. F., & Coates, V. T. (2016). Next stages in technology assessment: Topics and tools. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 113, 112–114.
- Decker, M., & Ladikas, M. (Eds.) (2004). Bridges between science, society, and policy: Technology assessment: Methods and impacts. New York: Springer.
- Geisler, E. (2002). The metrics of technology evaluation: where we stand and where we should go from here. Technology Management, 24)4(, 341–374.
- Grunwald, A. (2011). Responsible innovation: Bringing together technology assessment, applied ethics, and STS research, Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies, 7, 9–31.
- Grunwald, A. (2014). Technology assessment for responsible innovation. In Responsibe innovation 1: Innovative solutions for global issues. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
- Grunwald, A. (2020). The objects of technology assessment. Hermeneutic extension of consequentialist reasoning. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(1), 96-112.
- Hellström, T. (2003). Systemic innovation and risk: Technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation. Technology in Society, 25, 369–384.
- Keller, P., & Ledergerber, U. (1998). Bimodal System Dynamic: A Technology assessment and forecasting approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 58, 47–52.
- Merkhofer, M. W. (1982). A process for technology assessment based on decision analysis. Technological Forecasting And Social Change, 22, 237–265.
- Palm, E., & Hansson, S. O. (2006). The case for ethical technology assessment. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 73, 543–558.
- Ramanujam, V., & Saaty, T. L. (1981). Technological choice in the less developed Countries: An analytic hierarchy approach. Technological Forecasting And Social Change, 19, 81–98.
- Schomberg, V. (2011). Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. In M. Dusseldorp and R. Beecroft (Eds). Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden,Wiesbaden: Vs Verlag.
- Sharif, M. N., & Sundararajan, V. (1983). A quantitative model for the evaluation of technological alternatives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 24, 15–29.
- Watson, R. H. (1978). Interpretive structural modeling: A useful tool for technology assessment? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 11, 165–185.
- The International Center for Technology Assessment, http://www.icta.org
- Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany, https://www.itas.kit.edu
- Rathenau Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands, https://www.rathenau.nl/en
- Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, London, https://www.parliament.uk/post
- European Parliament, Science and Technology Options Assessment, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/stoa
- Institute of Technology Assessment of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, https://www.oeaw.ac.at/itaen/home
- The Danish Board of Technology Foundation, Copenhagen, http://www.tekno.dk/?lang=en
- Norwegian Board of Technology, Oslo, https://teknologiradet.no/english/
- Foundation for technology Assessment, Swiss, https://www.ta-swiss.ch/en/
- National Institute of Technology and Evaluation, Tokyo, Japan, https://www.nite.go.jp/en/
|
2
